both newspapers sold themselves for free lunch, boarding or an easy access for anything & everything world badminton federation. or may be not ? perhaps both newspapers have purchased the pics for peanuts !!!!! or they haven't sent a photographer to london olympics ?
there is a stoic silence in the print media against the published photographs. why ? where are the women rights upholders & hooligans of upholding indian culture. why hypocrites of india are silent ?
are both newspapers considered saina nehwal as a cheap woman who could not stand up against recently introduced experimental skirt rule.
for the impatient readers, click the below links to view the pics :
http://infocus.cc/?url=http://www.thehindu.com/sport/article3717963.ece&p=1200&b=ff&l=157&t=336&w=644&h=452
http://infocus.cc/?url=http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/getimage.dll?path=TOICH/2012/08/03/3/Img/Pc0031700.jpg&p=1200&b=ff&l=10&t=12&w=310&h=212
if you are patient, click the links to read the published articles :
saina nehwal cruises into the semifinals [ http://www.thehindu.com/sport/article3717963.ece ]
super saina just a win away from oly medal [ http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/timesinlondon/entry/super-saina-just-a-win-away-from-olympic-medal ]
pics [ perhaps these photographs have copyright license ] :
note : the CC BY-NC-ND does not apply to the shown images.
This work by maniac.vardhan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
